Open Enrollment Is Here!


U.S. Supreme Court Redefines "Undue Hardship" in Religious Accommodation Cases: Implications for Employers

U.S. Supreme Court Redefines “Undue Hardship” in Religious Accommodation Cases: Implications for Employers

Introduction: The U.S. Supreme Court has made a significant ruling, expanding the duty of employers to provide religious accommodation to employees under Title VII. This unanimous decision redefines the concept of “undue hardship” in cases involving religious accommodation, bringing about changes that employers must be aware of to comply with Federal immigration laws. Let’s delve into the background of the case, the new “undue hardship” standard, and its implications for employers.

U.S. Supreme Court Redefines "Undue Hardship" in Religious Accommodation Cases: Implications for Employers

Background of the Case: The case revolves around Gerald Groff, an Evangelical Christian and Sunday Sabbath observer, working for the U.S. Postal Service since 2012. When the postal service entered into an agreement with Amazon for Sunday deliveries, Groff, who generally did not have Sunday work obligations, faced the dilemma of having to work on Sundays. The postal service attempted to accommodate his request but faced challenges, leading to disciplinary action and Groff’s eventual resignation.

Understanding “Undue Hardship”: Under Title VII, employers must reasonably accommodate their employees’ sincerely held religious beliefs unless it results in “undue hardship.” Historically, courts interpreted this term to mean anything more than a “de minimis” cost on employers, setting a relatively low accommodation bar. However, the Supreme Court’s recent ruling clarifies the “undue hardship” standard, adopting a more stringent approach.

The New “Undue Hardship” Standard: The high Court now requires employers to show “substantial increased costs” relative to their business’s operation when granting religious accommodations. The decision emphasizes evaluating all relevant factors, including the nature of the accommodations and their impact on the employer’s size and operating costs.

Implications for Employers: This ruling means employers can no longer rely on demonstrating a burden beyond de minimis to avoid providing religious accommodations. While the decision does not establish a clear test, it underscores the need for employers to make more efforts to accommodate religious requests. Precisely how much more accommodation is required remains to be seen, but employers must navigate these changes diligently to comply with the new standard.

U.S. Supreme Court Redefines "Undue Hardship" in Religious Accommodation Cases: Implications for Employers

Conclusion: The Supreme Court’s decision marks a significant shift in the “undue hardship” standard for religious accommodations under Title VII. Employers must now go beyond minimal efforts to accommodate religious requests, considering all relevant factors and the impact on their business operations. With these changes in effect, businesses must proactively review and adapt their policies to ensure compliance with Federal immigration laws and promote a more inclusive workplace environment.



Schedule time on our CEO Mark Herschlag’s calendar for any questions on insurance or compliance HERE!